Artwork

Innhold levert av The Federalist Society. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av The Federalist Society eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå frakoblet med Player FM -appen!

Is There a "Death Squad" at the U.S. Patent Office?: Examining the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

 
Del
 

Manage episode 185283211 series 1460717
Innhold levert av The Federalist Society. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av The Federalist Society eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

In 2011, Congress created a new administrative tribunal in the U.S. Patent Office with the power to cancel previously granted patents, called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB was created to provide an efficient and inexpensive administrative process for eliminating low-quality patents what are called “bad patents. Despite its laudable purpose, the PTAB has earned a reputation among some as a prime example of regulatory overreach. The PTABs critics cite a wide range of concerns including inadequate due process protections and bias against patents. A former federal appellate chief judge even referred to PTAB administrative judges as “patent death squads. So, is the PTAB indeed harming the property rights that have helped to drive the U.S. innovation economy for over 200 years or, is it functioning as intended? What are the concerns of its detractors? If these concerns are valid, does the PTAB need simple reform or more?

This teleforum is held in conjunction with the Monday, August 14 release of a paper authored by members of the Regulatory Transparency Projects Intellectual Property Working Group. The paper is called “Crippling the Innovation Economy: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office. This paper, which discusses this new administrative tribunal at the Patent Office, is available for viewing and download atRegProject.org.

Featuring:

  • Josh Malone,Inventor,Bunch O Balloons

  • Kristen Osenga,Professor, University of Richmond School of Law

  • Brian OShaughnessy,Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

  • DevonWesthill,Director, Regulatory Transparency Project (Moderator)

  continue reading

11 episoder

Artwork
iconDel
 
Manage episode 185283211 series 1460717
Innhold levert av The Federalist Society. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av The Federalist Society eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

In 2011, Congress created a new administrative tribunal in the U.S. Patent Office with the power to cancel previously granted patents, called the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB was created to provide an efficient and inexpensive administrative process for eliminating low-quality patents what are called “bad patents. Despite its laudable purpose, the PTAB has earned a reputation among some as a prime example of regulatory overreach. The PTABs critics cite a wide range of concerns including inadequate due process protections and bias against patents. A former federal appellate chief judge even referred to PTAB administrative judges as “patent death squads. So, is the PTAB indeed harming the property rights that have helped to drive the U.S. innovation economy for over 200 years or, is it functioning as intended? What are the concerns of its detractors? If these concerns are valid, does the PTAB need simple reform or more?

This teleforum is held in conjunction with the Monday, August 14 release of a paper authored by members of the Regulatory Transparency Projects Intellectual Property Working Group. The paper is called “Crippling the Innovation Economy: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office. This paper, which discusses this new administrative tribunal at the Patent Office, is available for viewing and download atRegProject.org.

Featuring:

  • Josh Malone,Inventor,Bunch O Balloons

  • Kristen Osenga,Professor, University of Richmond School of Law

  • Brian OShaughnessy,Partner, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

  • DevonWesthill,Director, Regulatory Transparency Project (Moderator)

  continue reading

11 episoder

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM scanner netter for høykvalitets podcaster som du kan nyte nå. Det er den beste podcastappen og fungerer på Android, iPhone og internett. Registrer deg for å synkronisere abonnement på flere enheter.

 

Hurtigreferanseguide

Copyright 2024 | Sitemap | Personvern | Vilkår for bruk | | opphavsrett