))
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July. SIDEBAR Episodes will take place between the end of the current term and the start of the next term. (July - October)
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court's website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
The Term is a podcast from Law360 for the busy U.S. Supreme Court watcher. Give us about 15 minutes each week and we'll catch you up on all the big action at the nation's highest court, along with a list of what to watch in the coming sessions. Hosts senior Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover in Washington, D.C. and editor-at-large Natalie Rodriguez in New York City cut through a busy docket to focus on the key cases and developments everyone will be talking about.
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
Free Law Project
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
Government court cases
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
T
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
1
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
Hemant Mehta
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
Decisions of the Supreme Court, summarized by the court itself.Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi, With no personal commentary, you can make up your own mind about the decisions. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly---Paypal:https://paypal.me/SCOTUSsyllabus---Cash App: $RJDieken---Venmo: RJ-Dieken
T
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
1
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
T
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
1
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
L
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
1
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
Aaron Larson
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aaron-larson2/support
A
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
1
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
Get A Life Media, Billy Crone
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E22: No. 1 Or No. 2? Justices Ask In Potty Humor Case
21:08
21:08
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
21:08
The nation's most revered courtroom sounded like an elementary school classroom at times Wednesday, as the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court discussed a trademark battle over a poop-themed dog toy. On this week's episode, Law360's The Term discusses the bizarre case, which saw one justice ask whether the toy "purportedly contained some sort of dog…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products LLC, No. 22-148 [Arg: 3.22.2023]
1:23:27
1:23:27
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:23:27
Issue(s): (1) Whether humorous use of another’s trademark as one’s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act’s traditional likelihood-of-confusion analysis, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1), or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims; and (2) whether humorous use of another’s mark as one’s own …
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
His Majesty the King v. S.S. (40147)
1:22:45
1:22:45
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:22:45
(PUBLICATION BAN) The respondent was convicted of sexual assault and sexual interference, two offences perpetrated on the complainant when she was between six and eight years old. The convictions were based on the complainant’s unsworn, videotaped police statement, which the trial judge admitted into evidence by application of the principled except…
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products LLC
1:23:26
1:23:26
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:23:26
A case in which the Court will decide whether humorous use of another’s trademark as one’s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act’s likelihood-of-confusion analysis, or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection.
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products
1:11:39
1:11:39
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:11:39
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP ProductsAv Supreme Court of the United States
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should issue declaratory judgment and/or enjoin New Jersey from withdrawing from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York, which grants the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor broad regulatory and law-enforcement powers over all operations at the Port of New York and New Jersey.…
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
Breaking down the arguments as Supreme Court hears challenge to student loan relief plan
11:13
11:13
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
11:13
The fate of student debt relief promised for some 40 million Americans is in the hands of the Supreme Court. The justices heard arguments in high-stakes cases over the legality of President Biden's student loan forgiveness plan. John Yang discussed the arguments with NewsHour Supreme Court Analyst Marcia Coyle and Danielle Douglas-Gabriel of The Wa…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic Int'l, No. 21-1043 [Arg: 03.21.2023]
1:27:15
1:27:15
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:27:15
Issue(s): Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit erred in applying the Lanham Act, which provides civil remedies for infringement of U.S. trademarks, extraterritorially to Abitron Austria GmbH's foreign sales, including purely foreign sales that never reached the United States or confused U.S. consumers. ★ Support this podcast on Pa…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Coinbase v. Bielski, No. 22-105 [Arg: 03.21.2023]
1:22:22
1:22:22
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:22:22
Issue(s): Whether a non-frivolous appeal of the denial of a motion to compel arbitration ousts a district court’s jurisdiction to proceed with litigation pending appeal. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Arizona v. Navajo Nation, No. 21-1484 [Arg: 03.20.2023]
1:50:03
1:50:03
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:50:03
Issue(s): (1) Whether the opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, allowing the Navajo Nation to proceed with a claim to enjoin the secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior to develop a plan to meet the Navajo Nation’s water needs and manage the mainstream of the Colorado River in the Lower Basin so as not to interfere with…
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Attorney General of Canada v. Attorney General of Alberta (40195)
2:11:55
2:11:55
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
2:11:55
The Government of Alberta sought the Court of Appeal of Alberta’s opinion on the constitutionality of the Impact Assessment Act, S.C. 2019, c. 28, s. 1 (“IAA”) (found in Part 1 of Bill C 69, entitled An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amen…
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.
1:27:14
1:27:14
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:27:14
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Lanham Act permits the owner of a U.S.-registered trademark to recover damages for the use of that trademark when the infringement occurred outside the United States and is not likely to cause confusion in the United States.
A case in which the Court will decide whether a non-frivolous appeal of the denial of a motion to compel arbitration ousts a district court’s jurisdiction to proceed with litigation pending appeal.
Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiAv Supreme Court of the United States
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.
1:14:55
1:14:55
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:14:55
Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc.Av Supreme Court of the United States
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Attorney General of Quebec, et al. v. H. V. (40093)
2:58:34
2:58:34
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
2:58:34
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) The respondent, H.V., pleaded guilty to a child luring offence committed between July 31 and August 9, 2017, which was prosecuted summarily. During sentencing, the respondent argued that the 6-month mandatory minimum sentence provided for in s. 172.1(2)(b) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, was unconstitutional un…
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Emanuel Kahsai v. His Majesty the King (40044)
1:46:39
1:46:39
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:46:39
At trial, the appellant was convicted by a jury of two counts of first degree murder. The appellant had refused to retain counsel subsequent to the preliminary inquiry and was adamant that he wanted to represent himself. Two separate amicus curiae were appointed to assist the court at different times; however, he refused to co-operate with either. …
Arizona v. Navajo NationAv Supreme Court of the United States
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E21: How Tom Goldstein Changed The Game
29:12
29:12
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
29:12
Tom Goldstein is retiring from his U.S. Supreme Court practice after 25 years and more than 40 arguments — but perhaps bigger than his legal imprint is how his unusual methods changed the Supreme Court bar forever. On this week's episode of The Term, we talk with Tom about the criticism he faced early in his career as an advocate, why he started th…
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E20: What We Learned, And Didn't, From The Student Debt Hearings
35:44
35:44
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
35:44
The Supreme Court's conservative justices seemed to agree that the Biden administration has exceeded its authority with its massive student debt relief plan, but it's still unclear whether they believe six Republican states and two individuals have standing to challenge it in court. Law360's The Term recaps more than three hours of arguments on thi…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
New York v. New Jersey, No. 22O156 [Arg: 3.1.2023]
1:28:34
1:28:34
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:28:34
Issue(s): Whether the Supreme Court should issue declaratory judgment and/or enjoin New Jersey from withdrawing from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York, which grants the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor broad regulatory and law-enforcement powers over all operations at the Port of New York and New Jersey. ★ Support this podcast…
A case in which the Court will decide whether New Jersey can withdraw from an interstate compact with New York that created a waterfront commission with police power.
New York v. New JerseyAv Supreme Court of the United States
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Department of Education v. Brown, No. 22-535 [Arg: 2.28.2023]
1:15:38
1:15:38
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:15:38
Issue(s): (1) Whether two student-loan borrowers have Article III standing to challenge the Department of Education's student-debt relief plan; and (2) whether the department's plan is statutorily authorized and was adopted in a procedurally proper manner. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Biden v. Nebraska, No. 22-506 [Arg: 2.28.2023]
2:02:34
2:02:34
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
2:02:34
Issue(s): (1) Whether six states have Article III standing to challenge the Department of Education's student-debt relief plan; and (2) whether the plan exceeds the secretary of education's statutory authority or is arbitrary and capricious. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
1
Department of Education v. Brown
1:15:37
1:15:37
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:15:37
A case in which the Court will consider a challenge to the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Biden administration can proceed with its student-debt relief program.
Dept. of Education v. BrownAv Supreme Court of the United States
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Dubin v. U.S., No. 22-10 [Arg: 2.27.2023]
1:32:30
1:32:30
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:32:30
Issue(s): Whether a person commits aggravated identity theft any time they mention or otherwise recite someone else’s name while committing a predicate offense. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
A case in which the Court will decide whether a person commits aggravated identity theft any time they mention or otherwise recite someone else’s name while committing a predicate offense.
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E19: BigTech Seems Likely To Keep Immunity, For Now...
34:58
34:58
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
34:58
The Supreme Court seemed largely interested this week in preserving the broad immunity that tech companies have enjoyed under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act for decades, fearful of crashing the billion-dollar internet economy that has prospered in large part because of that legal shield. Law360's The Term breaks down BigTech's big we…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Twitter v. Taamneh, No. 21-1496 [Arg: 2.22.2023]
2:29:43
2:29:43
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
2:29:43
Issue(s): (1) Whether a defendant that provides generic, widely available services to all its numerous users and “regularly” works to detect and prevent terrorists from using those services “knowingly” provided substantial assistance under 18 U.S.C. § 2333 merely because it allegedly could have taken more “meaningful” or “aggressive” action to prev…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Gonzalez v. Google LLC, No. 21-1333 [Arg: 2.21.2023]
2:40:42
2:40:42
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
2:40:42
Issue(s): Whether Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act immunizes interactive computer services when they make targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider, or only limits the liability of interactive computer services when they engage in traditional editorial functions (such as deciding whe…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, No. 21-887 [Arg: 1.18.2023]
1:28:59
1:28:59
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:28:59
Issue(s): (1) Whether, and in what circumstances, courts should excuse further exhaustion of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act’s administrative proceedings under Section 1415(l) when such proceedings would be futile; and (2) whether Section 1415(l) requires exhaustion of a non-IDEA claim seeking money damages that are not available un…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, No. 21-1436 [Arg: 1.17.2023]
1:03:33
1:03:33
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:03:33
Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly determined that 8 U.S.C. 1252(d)(1) prevented the court from reviewing petitioner's claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals engaged in impermissible factfinding because petitioner had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. U.S., No. 21-1450 [Arg: 1.17.2023]
1:35:58
1:35:58
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:35:58
Issue(s): Whether U.S. district courts may exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over criminal prosecutions against foreign sovereigns and their instrumentalities under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 and in light of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, No. 22-96 [Arg: 1.11.2023]
56:28
56:28
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
56:28
Issue(s): Whether the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act’s general grant of jurisdiction to the federal courts over claims against the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico and claims otherwise arising under PROMESA abrogate the Board’s sovereign immunity with respect to all federal and territorial clai…
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Glacier Northwest v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, No. 21-1449 [Arg: 1.10.2023]
1:26:01
1:26:01
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:26:01
Issue(s): Whether the National Labor Relations Act impliedly preempts a state tort claim against a union for intentionally destroying an employer's property in the course of a labor dispute. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
In re Grand Jury, No. 21-1397 [Arg: 1.9.2023; Decided 01.23.2023]
1:07:59
1:07:59
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:07:59
Issue(s): Whether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney-client privilege when obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the significant purposes behind the communication. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 21-1454 [Arg: 1.9.2023]
1:29:32
1:29:32
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:29:32
Issue(s): Whether the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which empowers the Federal Labor Relations Authority to regulate the labor practices of federal agencies only, empower it to regulate the labor practices of state militias. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Moore v. Harper, No. 21-1271 [Arg: 12.7.2022]
2:53:48
2:53:48
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
2:53:48
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, No. 21-1052 [Arg: 12.6.2022]
1:21:24
1:21:24
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:21:24
Whether the government has authority to dismiss a False Claims Act suit after initially declining to proceed with the action, and what standard applies if the government has that authority.Av Austin Songer
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, No. 21-908 [Arg: 12.6.2022]
1:12:44
1:12:44
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
1:12:44
Whether an individual may be subject to liability for the fraud of another that is barred from discharge in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), by imputation, without any act, omission, intent or knowledge of her own.Av Austin Songer
A case in which the Court will decide whether an internet platform “knowingly” provides substantial assistance under 18 U.S.C. § 2333 merely because it allegedly could have taken more “meaningful” or “aggressive” action to prevent such use, and whether an internet platform whose services were not used in connection with the specific “act of interna…
Twitter, Inc. v. TaamnehAv Supreme Court of the United States
A case in which the Court will decide whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields internet platforms from liability when their algorithms target users and recommend a third party’s content.
Gonzalez v. Google LLCAv Supreme Court of the United States
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E18: Supreme Court Lawyers Adapt To Changed Bench
19:55
19:55
Spill senere
Spill senere
Lister
Lik
Likt
19:55
The Supreme Court has replaced nearly half of its members in the last five years. This week, The Term discusses how lawyers who practice there have adjusted to the changing dynamics on the nation’s top bench.Av Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
