))
Algorithm Integrity Matters: for Financial Services leaders, to enhance fairness and accuracy in data processing
«
»
Article 17. Algorithm Integrity: Audit vs Review
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on October 30, 2025 20:37 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 453515666 series 3594717
Innhold levert av Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Spoken by a human version of this article.
The terminology – “audit” vs “review” - is important, but clarity about deliverables is more important when commissioning algorithm integrity assessments.
Audits are formal, with an opinion or conclusion that can often be shared externally. Reviews come in various forms and typically produce recommendations, for internal use.
Regardless of the terminology you use, when commissioning an assessment, clearly define and document the expected deliverable, including the report content and intended distribution, to ensure expectations are met.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
27 episoder
Del
