New Research Shows The Clean Air Act Always Intended To Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Damages podcast

Artwork

Science Society Social Sciences True Crime Documentaries Critical Frequency

Innhold levert av Critical Frequency. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Critical Frequency eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

Damages »
New Research Shows the Clean Air Act Always Intended to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions

2M ago 31:52

Del

MP3•Episoder hjem

Innhold levert av Critical Frequency. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Critical Frequency eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts vs. EPA that when the U.S. Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, climate science was “in its infancy,” implying that government officials could never have intended for the legislation to cover the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2022, SCOTUS doubled down on that idea, ruling in West Virginia v EPA that since the Clean Air Act didn't explicitly talk about climate change, the EPA cannot regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Now, new historical evidence unearthed by a team of Harvard University researchers led by Naomi Oreskes calls the court's understanding of the history of climate science into question, which could have major implications for the government's ability to regulate climate-changing emissions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

… continue reading

67 episoder

#Science #Society #Social Sciences #True Crime #Documentaries #Critical Frequency

Artwork

New Research Shows the Clean Air Act Always Intended to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions

20 subscribers

published 2M ago

Del

MP3•Episoder hjem

Innhold levert av Critical Frequency. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Critical Frequency eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts vs. EPA that when the U.S. Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, climate science was “in its infancy,” implying that government officials could never have intended for the legislation to cover the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2022, SCOTUS doubled down on that idea, ruling in West Virginia v EPA that since the Clean Air Act didn't explicitly talk about climate change, the EPA cannot regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Now, new historical evidence unearthed by a team of Harvard University researchers led by Naomi Oreskes calls the court's understanding of the history of climate science into question, which could have major implications for the government's ability to regulate climate-changing emissions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

… continue reading

67 episoder

#Science #Society #Social Sciences #True Crime #Documentaries #Critical Frequency

همه قسمت ها

×

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM scanner netter for høykvalitets podcaster som du kan nyte nå. Det er den beste podcastappen og fungerer på Android, iPhone og internett. Registrer deg for å synkronisere abonnement på flere enheter.

Lytt til 500+ tema