Artwork

Innhold levert av In-depth Creative. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av In-depth Creative eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå frakoblet med Player FM -appen!

ASEAN Through the Lens of a Human Rights Activist Working Inside ASEAN

26:53
 
Del
 

Manage episode 263764763 series 2698143
Innhold levert av In-depth Creative. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av In-depth Creative eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

Although ASEAN has been under fire for its powerlessness in the face of several human rights atrocities such as attacks on Rohingya ethnic minority in Myanmar, internal ASEAN officials, some of whom have lengthy human rights activism experience, remain optimistic that the association can be a force for good. What do they actually see in ASEAN’s non-interference and consensus principles? Why do they keep on appeasing the Myanmar Government while violence raged in Myanmar’s Rakhine State? Why do member states tend to be more closed off in ASEAN forums than in the UN forum? And more questions. Join us for a discussion with the Indonesian Representative of the ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission of Human Rights (AICHR), Yuyun Wahyuningrum.
|| 0.0 – 1.31:Current criticism towards ASEAN. Questions of the Episode | 1.35 – 3.37:
Limits and Challenges of AICHR in Responding to Human Rights Issues in ASEAN.
Countries without human rights commission body | 3.49 – 9.27: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 1). Background of the establishment of ASEAN that shapes current principles. How far should we make compromises? | 9.29 – 12.09: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 2). Lessons learned from the late Surim Pitsuwan: Practice first, Institutionalise later. How seemingly trivial effort is actually a huge progress in ASEAN. | 12.11 – 13.49: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 3). Development of the “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in practice.| 13.50 – 16.52: The need for AICHR to evolve. How AICHR respond to sanitised human rights reports by ASEAN member states? Practice first, institutionalise later. | 17.19 – 21.24: Difference reporting attitude and openness in Geneva and in ASEAN. Plan to Implement Advisory Notes and other changes in AICHR. | 21.37 – 24.39: Why are some countries more open in UN forums compared to that in ASEAN? | 24.40 – 25.52: Funding of ASEAN. | 25.52 – 26.53: Closing.||

  continue reading

65 episoder

Artwork
iconDel
 
Manage episode 263764763 series 2698143
Innhold levert av In-depth Creative. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av In-depth Creative eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

Although ASEAN has been under fire for its powerlessness in the face of several human rights atrocities such as attacks on Rohingya ethnic minority in Myanmar, internal ASEAN officials, some of whom have lengthy human rights activism experience, remain optimistic that the association can be a force for good. What do they actually see in ASEAN’s non-interference and consensus principles? Why do they keep on appeasing the Myanmar Government while violence raged in Myanmar’s Rakhine State? Why do member states tend to be more closed off in ASEAN forums than in the UN forum? And more questions. Join us for a discussion with the Indonesian Representative of the ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission of Human Rights (AICHR), Yuyun Wahyuningrum.
|| 0.0 – 1.31:Current criticism towards ASEAN. Questions of the Episode | 1.35 – 3.37:
Limits and Challenges of AICHR in Responding to Human Rights Issues in ASEAN.
Countries without human rights commission body | 3.49 – 9.27: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 1). Background of the establishment of ASEAN that shapes current principles. How far should we make compromises? | 9.29 – 12.09: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 2). Lessons learned from the late Surim Pitsuwan: Practice first, Institutionalise later. How seemingly trivial effort is actually a huge progress in ASEAN. | 12.11 – 13.49: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 3). Development of the “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in practice.| 13.50 – 16.52: The need for AICHR to evolve. How AICHR respond to sanitised human rights reports by ASEAN member states? Practice first, institutionalise later. | 17.19 – 21.24: Difference reporting attitude and openness in Geneva and in ASEAN. Plan to Implement Advisory Notes and other changes in AICHR. | 21.37 – 24.39: Why are some countries more open in UN forums compared to that in ASEAN? | 24.40 – 25.52: Funding of ASEAN. | 25.52 – 26.53: Closing.||

  continue reading

65 episoder

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM scanner netter for høykvalitets podcaster som du kan nyte nå. Det er den beste podcastappen og fungerer på Android, iPhone og internett. Registrer deg for å synkronisere abonnement på flere enheter.

 

Hurtigreferanseguide

Copyright 2024 | Sitemap | Personvern | Vilkår for bruk | | opphavsrett