))
68. Commercial contracts: the issues of implied terms or unjust enrichment
Manage episode 409108343 series 3564856
Innhold levert av Gowling WLG. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Gowling WLG eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Does silence really speak volumes? In this podcast, our Commercial Litigation team explores the issues of implied terms and unjust enrichment
Party A agrees to pay Party B a large fee if B introduces a purchaser who buys A's property for £6.5 million. If B introduces a purchaser who pays less, is B entitled to a fee?
Commercial contract lawyers David Lowe and Andrew Smith explore the Supreme Court decision in the case of Barton & Ors v Morris & Anor [2023] in which the court declined to imply terms for reasonable remuneration.
A more detailed insight into this case, as well as a full transcript of this podcast, is available on our website: gowlg.co/3IvWN6C
Gowling WLG is an international full-service law firm working across a range of industry sectors including real estate, government, financial services, life sciences and technology. We operate across the world with offices in the UK, Europe, Canada and the Middle East.
We regularly talk about a broad range of topics that may be of interest to you. Subscribe to receive our latest articles, podcasts and webinars straight to your inbox: https://gowlg.co/35efH2r
Alternatively, you can view our full selection of insights and resources here: https://gowlg.co/3IwEr41
Want to get to know us? Follow us on:
LinkedIn: https://gowlg.co/3hqmatB Twitter: https://gowlg.co/35Do0nY Facebook: https://gowlg.co/3th2w8N Instagram: https://gowlg.co/3ZqYIjD
This podcast may contain information of general interest about current legal issues, but does not give legal advice.
74 episoder
Del
