))
It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?
Manage episode 320498891 series 3278602
Innhold levert av Smith Freed Eberhard. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Smith Freed Eberhard eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news.
In this week's episode Partner Gordon Klug discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?". The Washington Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in denying a motion to compel arbitration without first having an evidentiary hearing, because the facts were insufficient to support a finding that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable.
25 episoder
Del
