Information Anarchy: The Case Against Sponsorships

Threadings.

Innhold levert av Ismatu Gwendolyn. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Ismatu Gwendolyn eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

11M ago 47:58

MP3•Episoder hjem

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on August 02, 2024 12:03 (1M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

The primary goal of this essay is to argue for a healthy skepticism of sponsorship-saturated media amidst a new age in information sharing, with secondary goals as following:

* to commit myself to The People and my people publicly by way of refusing to sell my word online, and

* to name explicitly the ways refusing traditional sponsorship places me in a decent amount of precarity.

* I’ma spoil the ending for you: I don’t want to run from precarity. Being unsteady forces me to lean on the communities that I say I value. I continually argue that refusing sponsorships as my primary mode of income forces me to expand. Now, I must trust the people for care instead of trusting them as a willing and endless site of extraction.

* Plus… willing? How much can you consent to extraction anyways? Bah. I get ahead of myself.

I wish to belong to The People and that means my word needs to be mine. Thank you for listening <3

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ismatu.substack.com/subscribe

52 episoder

#Society #Relationship #Philosophy #Ismatu Gwendolyn