Artwork

Innhold levert av Ulster University. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Ulster University eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå frakoblet med Player FM -appen!

Mairead Enright, Official Legal Histories and Where to Find Them: The Report of the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Inquiry

1:27:23
 
Del
 

Manage episode 291299357 series 2789602
Innhold levert av Ulster University. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Ulster University eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

Specially written histories have become an important tool in Irish state responses to ‘historical’ injustice, particularly those affecting women, their sexual, reproductive and family lives. Whatever form an inquiry takes, a ‘definitive’ history will be at its centre. Sometimes it will be authored by academic historians, though generally in collaboration with state-appointed legal advisors. Usually, it will be informed by the findings of some wider investigation, which purports to hear survivor evidence. The MBHCI Report contains the latest such history. It adapts and extends tactics also visible in predecessor reports, which dealt with abuses in industrial schools and Magdalene laundries, and obstetric violence in maternity hospitals.

This paper addresses how legal histories appear in these state responses to abuse, and especially in the MBHCI Report itself. It outlines three features: (i) a simplistic account of the relationship between state and religious law (ii) uncritical reliance on past Irish law (and on limited readings of past law) as the standard against which past abuses are evaluated and (iii) strategic use of current Irish law both to control evidence-gathering processes, and police later attempts to challenge the ‘official’ history produced in the Report. The paper will focus in detail on (ii) and invite discussion of alternative models of state engagement with difficult legal inheritances.

Máiréad Enright is Reader in Feminist Legal Studies and Leverhulme Research Fellow at Birmingham Law School.

  continue reading

40 episoder

Artwork
iconDel
 
Manage episode 291299357 series 2789602
Innhold levert av Ulster University. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Ulster University eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

Specially written histories have become an important tool in Irish state responses to ‘historical’ injustice, particularly those affecting women, their sexual, reproductive and family lives. Whatever form an inquiry takes, a ‘definitive’ history will be at its centre. Sometimes it will be authored by academic historians, though generally in collaboration with state-appointed legal advisors. Usually, it will be informed by the findings of some wider investigation, which purports to hear survivor evidence. The MBHCI Report contains the latest such history. It adapts and extends tactics also visible in predecessor reports, which dealt with abuses in industrial schools and Magdalene laundries, and obstetric violence in maternity hospitals.

This paper addresses how legal histories appear in these state responses to abuse, and especially in the MBHCI Report itself. It outlines three features: (i) a simplistic account of the relationship between state and religious law (ii) uncritical reliance on past Irish law (and on limited readings of past law) as the standard against which past abuses are evaluated and (iii) strategic use of current Irish law both to control evidence-gathering processes, and police later attempts to challenge the ‘official’ history produced in the Report. The paper will focus in detail on (ii) and invite discussion of alternative models of state engagement with difficult legal inheritances.

Máiréad Enright is Reader in Feminist Legal Studies and Leverhulme Research Fellow at Birmingham Law School.

  continue reading

40 episoder

Kaikki jaksot

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM scanner netter for høykvalitets podcaster som du kan nyte nå. Det er den beste podcastappen og fungerer på Android, iPhone og internett. Registrer deg for å synkronisere abonnement på flere enheter.

 

Hurtigreferanseguide

Copyright 2024 | Sitemap | Personvern | Vilkår for bruk | | opphavsrett