Artwork

Innhold levert av Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå frakoblet med Player FM -appen!

Attack Simulation

6:28
 
Del
 

Manage episode 212974287 series 1526526
Innhold levert av Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

In a previous podcast, we discussed purple-teaming as it compares to a conventional penetration test. Let’s now build on that approach, starting with the differences between attack simulation and conventional penetration tests. The methodology of attack simulation is the assumption that the network or a system will become compromised and the current controls will not prevent the infection.

So, how does attack simulation differ from purple-teaming? With purple-teaming, everyone know what controls are being tested and when. The attack simulation is a bit different, asthe focus is the emulation of a specific attacker group and their methods of obtaining sensitive data. In this podcast, LBMC Information Security’s Bill Dean discusses attack simulation, or what some people label adversary simulation.

  continue reading

67 episoder

Artwork

Attack Simulation

Cybersecurity Sense

89 subscribers

published

iconDel
 
Manage episode 212974287 series 1526526
Innhold levert av Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.

In a previous podcast, we discussed purple-teaming as it compares to a conventional penetration test. Let’s now build on that approach, starting with the differences between attack simulation and conventional penetration tests. The methodology of attack simulation is the assumption that the network or a system will become compromised and the current controls will not prevent the infection.

So, how does attack simulation differ from purple-teaming? With purple-teaming, everyone know what controls are being tested and when. The attack simulation is a bit different, asthe focus is the emulation of a specific attacker group and their methods of obtaining sensitive data. In this podcast, LBMC Information Security’s Bill Dean discusses attack simulation, or what some people label adversary simulation.

  continue reading

67 episoder

Alle afleveringen

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM scanner netter for høykvalitets podcaster som du kan nyte nå. Det er den beste podcastappen og fungerer på Android, iPhone og internett. Registrer deg for å synkronisere abonnement på flere enheter.

 

Hurtigreferanseguide

Copyright 2024 | Sitemap | Personvern | Vilkår for bruk | | opphavsrett