))
Episode #107: Hendrix speaks with R.P. Shottenkirk about how art can make the viewer feel as though they are being seen
Manage episode 424650359 series 2780951
Innhold levert av Dena Shottenkirk. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Dena Shottenkirk eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Timestamps:
- 00:10: Introductions with Hendrix
- 00:50: Is it about the purpose of Art? Defining cognition to boot.
- 01:50: Art is cognition, especially for the Artist. It comes from cognition. Pollock would approach Art differently from Picasso, likely based on the stimuli in their respective lives.
- 03:45: Emotion also comes from cognition. How you feel comes from how you think. A dog or a cat person, depending on our judgments, our emotions change. We bring our prejudices everywhere. Except in this case, regarding pet preferences
- 05:15: The way you capture the world depends on how you've seen it and how you've lived, even two close siblings can differ. Art functions as cognition for the Artist as a mix of judgment, emotion and other things.
- 06:30: For the viewer, Art & cognition stems from a stimulus you pick up from the Art. If a painting strikes you, brings complex emotions, it just might be cognition.
- 08:30: A Pollock piece brings the idea of being noticed. The chaos of the painting helps to bring out a personal feeling. It's not about noticing the chaos in the image, but instead noticing the chaos within.
- 10:30: If two individuals had the exact same events happen to them, would they become the same person? Are people intrinsically unique or are they purely formed through experience?
Kapitler
1. Episode #107: Hendrix speaks with R.P. Shottenkirk about how art can make the viewer feel as though they are being seen (00:00:00)
2. Introductions with Hendrix (00:00:10)
3. Is it about the purpose of Art? Defining cognition to boot. (00:00:50)
4. Art is cognition, especially for the Artist. It comes from cognition. Pollock would approach Art differently from Picasso, likely based on the stimuli in their respective lives. (00:01:50)
5. Emotion also comes from cognition. How you feel comes from how you think. A dog or a cat person, depending on our judgments, our emotions change. We bring our prejudices everywhere. Except in this case, regarding pet preferences (00:03:45)
6. The way you capture the world depends on how you've seen it and how you've lived, even two close siblings can differ. Art functions as cognition for the Artist as a mix of judgment, emotion and other things. (00:05:15)
7. For the viewer, Art & cognition stems from a stimulus you pick up from the Art. If a painting strikes you, brings complex emotions, it just might be cognition. (00:06:30)
8. A Pollock piece brings the idea of being noticed. The chaos of the painting helps to bring out a personal feeling. It's not about noticing the chaos in the image, but instead noticing the chaos within. (00:08:30)
9. If two individuals had the exact same events happen to them, would they become the same person? Are people intrinsically unique or are they purely formed through experience? (00:10:30)
125 episoder
Del
