))
Greg Doucette is WRONG About Science Based Lifting!
Manage episode 523293527 series 3619127
Innhold levert av Randall. Alt podcastinnhold, inkludert episoder, grafikk og podcastbeskrivelser, lastes opp og leveres direkte av Randall eller deres podcastplattformpartner. Hvis du tror at noen bruker det opphavsrettsbeskyttede verket ditt uten din tillatelse, kan du følge prosessen skissert her https://no.player.fm/legal.
Science based lifting is taking fire from every direction right now, and not just from trolls. After Aaron Solomon exposed major flaws in Mike Israetel’s PhD dissertation, a lot of people saw their chance to attack science itself.
Creators like Greg Doucette, Sam Sulek and a wave of others have been dropping reaction videos that paint evidence-based training as shaky, unreliable, or outright pointless. Some of the biggest names in the research world, including Jeff Nippard and Brad Schoenfeld, are getting dragged into the crossfire.
In this video, I break down several of these viral clips and bring some sanity back into the conversation. Science has flaws. Researchers make mistakes. Studies can be biased or poorly designed. None of that makes science useless.
My goal is not to defend anyone. My goal is to help lifters understand the difference between critiquing science, rejecting science, and how evidence, experience, and critical thinking actually work together.
00:00 Introduction
02:09 Sam Clips
07:38 Greg Clips
22:43 Things to Look for in Studies
Coaching inquiries email me at [email protected] or visit alwaysadaptive.com
53 episoder
Del
